Come mr tally man pdf#

Carlisle, Yes, 80-62 on same-sex marriage No, 89-102 on ordination.Twenty-eightВ presbyteries have swung the other way - voting вЂњyesвЂќ on same-sex marriage, but voting вЂњnoвЂќ three years ago on the ordination issue. Yellowstone, No, 19-25 on same-sex marriage Yes, 27-25 on ordination.

South Alabama, No, 22-32 on same-sex marriage Yes, 34-33 on ordination.Savannah, No, 27-41 onВ same-sex marriage Yes, 40-33 on ordination.Riverside, No, 30-38 on same-sex marriage Yes, 58-45 on ordination.Grand Canyon, No, 59-59 on same-sex marriage Yes, 84-53 on ordination.Eastminster, No, 34-36 on same-sex marriage Yes, 46-45 on ordination.

Eastern Oklahoma, No, 33-46 on same-sex marriage Yes, 55-53 on ordaining LGBTQ.

SevenВ presbyteries which voted in favor of ordaining LGBTQ people in 2010-2011 have voted against same-sex marriageВ in this yearвЂ™s vote.В They are: Of the 171 presbyteries in the PCUSA, 35 switched their vote on sexuality-related issues in four years timeВ - votingВ one way in 2010-2011 on the issue of ordaining lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) as deacons, elders and pastors in the PCUSAВ (called Amendment 10A), and reversing their vote on same-sex marriage (Amendment 14F). Dakota and Western Kentucky presbyteries took no action on the issue. The last presbyteries to vote included Kendall (17 yes вЂ“ 6 no) Mackinac (38 yes вЂ“ 23 no) and Western Colorado voting against changing the definition of marriage. If pressed, you will have to substantiate why the denominational standards are not controlling and binding by pointing to your particular congregationвЂ™s demonstrated consistent commitment to traditional marriage.вЂќ Final presbyteryВ votes on 14F Identify where your local church differs theologically from your parent denomination and clearly articulate the Biblical and Confessional reasons for those differences. LaBerge echos the counsel being offered by the Christian Legal Society, the Alliance Defending Freedom, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, the North American Lutheran Church and the Anglican Church North America: вЂњIf you have not done so already, now is the time for every church session to review its organizational documents. However, after reading the document, Carmen Fowler LaBerge, president of the Presbyterian Lay Committee, has warned thatВ вЂњproving a local congregation has a вЂsincerely held religious beliefвЂ™ that is no longer shared by the denomination with which it is affiliated will mean that thereвЂ™s no larger ecclesiastical backstop for PCUSA churches вЂ¦ If you are a PCUSA teaching elder, you may currently have protection under the denominationвЂ™s constitution but it does not sound as if the denomination is prepared to defend you in civil court should the state determine to compel you.вЂќ Hodges,вЂќ - which clearly states that вЂњNothing in our Constitution shall compel a teaching elder to perform a marriage service that the teaching elder believes is contrary to the teaching elderвЂ™s discernment of the Holy Spirit and understanding of the Word of God.вЂќ The OGA released a document -В вЂњ Same Gender Marriage after Supreme Court: Obergefell v. Supreme Court is in keeping with that work.вЂќ The PCUSAвЂ™s Stated Clerk Grayde Parsons told the PNS that the denomination has вЂњadvocated for almost four decades for civil rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons. The PCUSA вЂњcelebratedвЂќ that decision, according to an article from The Presbyterian News Service. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states. Supreme CourtВ released its ruling in the case of Obergefell v. The PCUSAвЂ™s new definition of marriage went into effect on June 21, 2015, and soon after - on June 26 to be exact - the U.S.

The vote officially changed the definition of marriage found in the PCUSAвЂ™s constitution from between вЂњa man and a womanвЂќ to вЂњa unique relationship between two people, traditionally a man and a woman.вЂќ The amendment was actually approved on March 17, when a majority of Presbyterian Church (USA) presbyteries voted in favor ofВ changing the denominationвЂ™s definition of marriage so that same-sex weddings may be conducted by PCUSA pastors and inВ PCUSA churches.

Come mr tally man pdf#

Final vote tally for Amendment 14-F: 121В (yes) вЂ“ 48В (no), one no action, as of 7/7/15Д¬lick here to download a pdf file of the Amendment 14-F Vote( FINAL updated 7/7/15)ДЄccording to the Presbyterian Church (USA)вЂ™s Office of the General Assembly (OGA), the final vote tally for Amendment 14-F is 121В in favorВ andВ 48В against, with two presbyteriesВ taking no action on the issue.